Explaining complex research to a non-expert can be a daunting task, especially when you’re preparing for an academic interview. The challenge is not just simplifying your work, but also maintaining its depth and significance.
Many candidates struggle to communicate their research effectively because they either oversimplify and lose meaning or use too much jargon, making their explanation difficult to follow. The key to success is finding a balance that allows you to communicate your research in a clear, engaging, and accurate way.
This article will provide you with frameworks and strategies for breaking down complex topics, maintaining clarity, and using storytelling techniques to make your research accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Whether your audience is unfamiliar with your field or is a professional from another discipline, these approaches will help you articulate your work confidently without sacrificing its significance. By the end, you’ll be equipped with practical tools to present your research in a way that’s easy to understand, even for someone with no background in your area of expertise.
Are you preparing for an Academic Interview? OmniInterview provides personalized coaching programs to non-native English speakers preparing for Academic Interviews.
If you are expecting an interview in the future, consider becoming our next successful client. Let's find a time when we can speak about your interview and how OmniInterview can help you prepare for a confident interview in a Discovery Session.
Understanding Your Audience
When preparing to explain your research, the first step is understanding your audience’s level of knowledge. Knowing how much context your audience needs will help you tailor your language and choose the right details to include. An interviewer with a scientific background may understand some of the technical terms, while a panelist from a different field may need more basic explanations. Think about what your audience wants to know and how your research fits into a broader context that’s relevant to them.
It’s also important to be prepared to pivot and adjust your explanation based on their reactions and follow-up questions. If the interviewer looks confused or asks for clarification, be ready to shift your language, rephrase your points, or provide a relatable analogy. Flexibility is key, as your goal is not just to inform but to engage your listener in a meaningful way.
A Framework for Explaining Your Research
One effective way to structure your explanation is by using a five-part framework: Context, Problem, Approach, Outcome, and Impact. This framework helps you present your work clearly and logically, ensuring that each part of your explanation flows smoothly into the next.
Start with Context: Provide a brief overview of the broader area your research is part of. Think of this as setting the scene. Describe why this area of research is important and how it relates to real-world issues. This helps your listener understand the relevance of your work before diving into the details.
Next, introduce the Problem: Explain the specific question or challenge your research addresses. Use simple language and avoid jargon. If you’re studying a highly specialized topic, such as protein folding in neurodegenerative diseases, you might say:
“I’m studying why certain proteins don’t fold correctly, which is believed to be a key factor in diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.”
Then describe your Approach: Summarize the methods and techniques you used to tackle the problem. This is where candidates often get lost in technical details, but try to keep it focused on the big picture. Instead of going into experimental protocols or software tools, highlight the core ideas behind your approach. For example:
“To understand this, I used advanced imaging techniques to observe how proteins behave under different conditions.”
Discuss the Outcome: Share what you discovered and why it’s significant. Focus on the high-level results and their implications, rather than detailed statistical analyses. For instance:
“We found that under certain conditions, proteins tend to misfold and clump together, which could explain why these diseases progress the way they do.”
Finally, highlight the Impact: Explain how your findings contribute to the field and why they matter. This is where you can connect your research to a broader context, such as developing new therapeutic strategies or informing public policy. For example:
“Our findings could help develop drugs that prevent proteins from misfolding, potentially slowing the progression of these diseases.”
Using Analogies and Metaphors to Simplify Complex Concepts
One of the most effective ways to explain complex research to a non-expert is through analogies and metaphors. Analogies help make abstract ideas more tangible by relating them to everyday experiences. For instance, if you’re studying the immune system’s response to viral infections, you might compare the immune system to a security system that protects a building. The different components of the immune system can be explained as security guards, cameras, and alarms that work together to detect and neutralize intruders.
The key to using analogies is to ensure that they simplify without distorting the concept. Choose analogies that match the complexity of your research while making it easier for your audience to grasp the core idea. For example, if you’re working on a project about neural networks, you could say:
“Think of a neural network as a team of detectives working together to solve a case. Each detective looks for different clues, and together, they piece together the solution.”
Another technique is to use storytelling. Frame your research as a narrative, with a clear beginning, middle, and end. Start by introducing the problem, then describe how you approached it, and finish with what you discovered. This approach not only makes your explanation more engaging but also helps the audience remember your key points.
Common Mistakes to Avoid When Explaining Research
One common mistake is overloading your explanation with unnecessary background information. While it’s important to provide some context, going into a long history of the field or detailing unrelated research can overwhelm your audience. Instead, keep your background information concise and focus on what’s directly relevant to your work.
Another mistake is using too much technical jargon. Even if your interviewer is familiar with the field, too many specialized terms can make your explanation difficult to follow. A good rule of thumb is to introduce a technical term only if it’s essential and always explain it in simpler terms. For example, if you need to use “apoptosis” (a technical term for programmed cell death), briefly define it: “This process, known as apoptosis, is when cells are programmed to die, which is essential for keeping the body healthy.”
Lastly, avoid presenting your research as a list of experiments or procedures. Instead, focus on the big-picture significance of what you did. Explain why you chose a particular method, what the results mean, and how they contribute to your overall research question.
Sample Response Using the Framework
If your research involves studying climate change’s impact on marine ecosystems, you might say:
“My research focuses on understanding how rising sea temperatures are affecting coral reefs. Coral reefs are often called the ‘rainforests of the sea’ because they support a vast range of marine life. Recently, many reefs have been dying off due to a phenomenon called coral bleaching, where higher temperatures cause corals to lose the algae they rely on for food. I’m studying how different species of coral respond to heat stress by analyzing their genetic makeup. What I’ve found so far is that some species have genetic adaptations that make them more resilient. This research could help identify which coral populations are most at risk and guide conservation efforts.”
This response uses simple language, a clear structure, and a relatable analogy to make the research accessible without sacrificing depth or accuracy.
Adapting Your Explanation for Different Audiences
Different audiences require different levels of detail. For an interviewer with a strong scientific background, you might include more specific terminology and focus on the nuances of your methodology. For a non-specialist, simplify your explanation and focus on the broader significance. Being able to pivot between different levels of explanation shows that you have a strong command of your research and can communicate it effectively to any audience.
Mastering the Conversation
Explaining your research to a non-expert is about more than just simplifying complex ideas—it’s about making your work relatable, engaging, and impactful. By using the right frameworks, analogies, and storytelling techniques, you can present your research in a way that resonates with any audience.
For personalized guidance on how to refine your research explanations and build confidence in communicating complex topics, book a discovery session with OmniInterview.
Commentaires